The Defendants
The Defendants Podcast
Case Files: The Hockey Canada Scandal
0:00
-1:43:30

Case Files: The Hockey Canada Scandal

We're discussing what happened, why it played out that way, and what we think that can tell us about not just the justice system, but about us, and how our reactions contribute to the problem

This week, we’re trying something new. Introducing The Defendants: Case Files

A new monthly series where Jane and her friend Anuja, a human rights expert, are going to look into a specific case that caught our attention, and ignited conversation. We’re going to discuss what happened, and why it played out that way, and what we think that can tell us about not just the justice system, but about us, and how our reactions contribute to the problem.

The aim of the series is to continue conversations around how culture, and the justice system responds to Sexual Assault cases - especially those that have dominated headlines. It’s our way of helping listeners build upon their understanding of the system and all the factors at play, as broken down by the first 6 episodes of The Defendants series.

First up, the case we’ve been asked about the most over the last year. Hockey Canada


First things first. Thank you for listening, as an independent project that’s growing grassroots - your support means everything to us. YOU are how this work will grow, and how future conversations will shape ideas towards change . Thank you for being here.

The Defendants is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.


Thanks to the sponsors of today’s episode: Our Substack subscribers and Tip Jar Patrons !!

The defendants is a grassroots project, as our small independent team, we decided to create the episodes for you, and grow as we go.

Life is keeping us very busy as we work on this series alongside our other jobs to pay the many bills that life brings. Your support is an essential part of what will help us continue, and to grow!! We have big plans that we can’t wait to share with you, which leads us to humbly ask for your support.

There are 4 big ways you can help:

  1. If an episode resonates with you, or if you learnt something, please share - whether than be with a friend (in conversation or via DM), or on your go-to social platform - we love seeing your posts and thoughts @ thedefendantspodcast

  2. We know budgets are tight, but if you have the ability to become a Substack subscriber you can sign up here

  3. We’re always looking for good people and new connections - if you know of a business or organisation that we should connect with to discuss partnership, support, sponsorship or know of a grant / fund we should be aware of - let us know by emailing defendantspodoutreach@protonmail.com!

  4. Finally, don’t forget to follow or subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts. It’s a small step, but a big help when it comes to growing the reach of our work.


Show Notes

Get in Touch!

If you have questions or ideas about the show we’d love to hear them!

Email us at defendantspodoutreach@protonmail.com

You can also find us on instagram: we’re @thedefendantspodcast and Jane is @jane_aster_roe

If you want Jane to appear on your show, email Dalton Higgins at daltonhiggins@gmail.com.

Resources:

SA Survivor Resource Document - This document contains Canadian, U.S, and Global sources to find guidance, information, and aid for survivors of sexual assault. Detailed descriptions of each resource within the document.

Court Documents:

The verdict:

R. v. McLeod, et al., 2025 ONSC 4319 (CanLII)

Motion for second mistrial:

R. v. McLeod, et al., 2025 ONSC 2946 (CanLII)

Motion on past recorded evidence:

R. v. McLeod, et al., 2025 ONSC 3225 (CanLII)

Motion on hearsay evidence:

R. v. McLeod, et al., 2025 ONSC 3226 (CanLII)

The Criminal Code on Sexual Assault and Consent:

Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c C-46

Background

The NHL’s Response:

NHL suspends players acquitted in 2018 sexual assault trial until Dec. 1 - Sportsnet.ca

Background on the Event:

“Hockey Canada sexual assault scandal” from The Globe and Mail

Hockey Canada sexual assault scandal: Timeline of events - ESPN

This article includes the quote:

By mid-month, Renney and Smith were brought before members of Parliament during a Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage meeting to discuss Hockey Canada’s response to the incident in question. Both testified that 19 players were “encouraged” but not required to speak with the governing body’s third-party investigators. They also added that the identities of those eight players in the court filing remained unknown to them. St-Onge announced from there a freeze on Hockey Canada’s federal funding until the findings of a third-party investigation were completed. Several high-profile sponsors -- including Scotiabank, Canadian Tire, Tim Hortons and Esso -- began distancing themselves from Hockey Canada. At the same time, multiple players from the 2018 world junior team began releasing statements denying they were involved in the alleged assault.

It was written by Elliotte Friedman for ESPN.

Coverage of the Trial and Hockey Canada:

The Hockey Canada trial could have been a reckoning. It was something else By Dan Robson and Katie Strang

Hockey Canada resists joining abuse registry as other sports publ

We Breed Lions Book by Rick Westhead

We Breed Lions: Confronting Canada’s Troubled Hockey Culture

CBC Live Play By Play - Goes back day by day through the Trial:

RECAP | After 8 weeks, Hockey Canada sex assault trial ends and fates of accused ex-players rest with judge

Westhead: Hockey Canada will no longer use investment fund to settle alleged sexual assault claim

Trial

Rick Westhead coverage: https://muckrack.com/rwesthead

See all Hockey Canada articles from April 2 2025 to August 21 2025

New York Times The Athletic Coverage: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/author/katie-strang/

See all articles on the Hockey Canada trial from January 28 2024 to July 24 2025

Highlighted links:

Crown attacks defense’s tactics, legal arguments in Hockey Canada trial By Katie Strang and Dan Robson

Hockey Canada trial judge limits Crown’s efforts to press Brett Howden By Dan Robson, Kamila Hinkson and Katie Strang

Prosecutors probe inconsistencies in teammate’s testimony in Hockey Canada trial By Dan Robson and Katie Strang

In Hockey Canada trial, E.M. agrees she remained compliant as a ‘coping mechanism’ By Dan Robson

Defense attorney questions E.M. about calling players men during Hockey Canada trial By Dan Robson, Kamila Hinkson and Katie Strang

Michael McLeod’s 2018 police interview differs from defense approach in Hockey Canada trial By Katie Strang and Dan Robson

Judge discharges jury at London hockey trial By Rick Westhead

A timeline of the Hockey Canada sexual assault trial and key moments | CBC News

Hockey Canada trial: Judge explains players’ absence | London Free Press

Kyle Beach Case

Quenneville, Bowman reinstated by NHL two years after Kyle Beach scandal – NBC Chicago

Report to the Chicago Blackhawks Hockey Team Regarding the Organization’s Response to Allegations of Sexual Misconduct by a Former Coach

New Oilers GM Stan Bowman: ‘My response was inadequate back in 2010’ - Sportsnet.ca

Additional Sources

Emily Owens, Consent in the Presence of Force (University of North Carolina Press: 2023)

Jane’s Quoted Article Sources

One:

Even before the verdict came, hockey teased the final message the scandal

would deliver. In early May, as the trial entered its fourth week, Joel Quenneville was

hired as head coach of the Anaheim Ducks, after a four-year exile from the

league for his part in covering up the sexual abuse of one of his former

players by a member of his coaching staff with the Chicago Blackhawks.

A few days later, two-time Stanley Cup champion and Olympic gold

medalist Adam Foote was named head coach of the Vancouver Canucks. At

the news conference introducing Foote, he declined to discuss what was

happening in the London courthouse where his son sat charged with sexual

assault.

Carroccia’s verdict was not needed for the discourse to turn to the pros and

cons of signing one of the Hockey Canada 5, presuming the NHL reinstates

them. Those musings swirled mostly on social media until former goalie

and current NHL Network analyst Kevin Weekes mused on TSN’s “Free

Agency Frenzy” special whether Carter Hart might be a fit in goal for the

Edmonton Oilers. Popular blogs and podcasts soon followed with similar

speculation. Carroccia’s complete exoneration of the players clears the

path for teams to add them. It will only be a matter of time.

In the final accounting, the most tangible change resulting from the

scandal is that Hockey Canada no longer has a slush fund to quietly pay off victims. Yes, some sponsors left, but several — like Tim Hortons, Telus, and Bauer — have already returned. Others, undoubtedly, will follow. There will be Hockey Canada galas in the years ahead to fete young heroes, just with no open bar, per new alcohol policies.

As for the message sent…

The players and the sport were the victims. And now the game is free to

move on.”

  • This comes from Dan Robson and Katie Strang from The New York Times Titled The Hockey Canada Trial Could have been a Reckoning. It Was Something Else

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6429400/2025/07/24/hockey-canada-trial-players-not-guilty/

Two:

“Civilians wouldn’t understand it,” a former player told the author when describing hockey’s locker room culture. “When we look around the room, we see 20 clones of ourselves and we all know we are better than everyone else. This is our culture. We breed lions, and how do you tell a lion to stop being a lion?”

And -

Jeremy Knight, a spokesperson for Hockey Canada, has noted the ITP does not have an investigatory or adjudicative role, but rather oversees the complaints process in a “confidential, neutral and procedurally fair manner,” using industry best practices.

But, is the absence of a public registry of ITP sanctions really an industry best practice? The Ontario Hockey Federation now produces an annual chart of maltreatment complaints submitted to the ITP involving its member organizations, but lists only statistics.

In contrast, the OHF’s summary of tampering allegations (recruiting players and announcing coaches prior to evaluations) lists descriptions of violations, sanctions, and names the associations involved. The federation notes it takes tampering allegations seriously and asks people to “imagine being partway through a season while already knowing you will not be part of your team next year. How would that affect your motivation, confidence, and sense of belonging? How would it impact your development on and off the ice?”

  • Both comes from a blog from Gluckstein Lawyers titled “Sports journalist Rick Westhead’s latest book, We Breed Lions: Confronting Canada’s Troubled Hockey Culture is hot off the press, but he may need to begin work on another chapter.”

https://www.gluckstein.com/sexual-abuse-lawyers/news-item/communication-is-key--what-the-latest-sexual-violence-incident-in-junior-hockey-tells-us-about-toxic-culture-in-the-sport

Consent is a piece of vocab the boys have seemingly been taught but don’t fully understand. “Ok ya fuck we are fine the boys who did things got consent so just tell them that and it’s fine,” Dubé texted a group chat with ten other players who had been there that night when they got word that Hockey Canada was looking into what had transpired in room 209. Consent is always a noun, never a verb. Later, Howden wrote, “If anything we should put allegations on her fuck.” Then, a moment of sobriety: “Yeah what should I say if they asked why I took the videos tho,” McLeod finally asked.”

And -

It doesn’t help that McLeod’s parents sit front row at the trial every day. Richard and Judi McLeod—who have been profiled as the ur-hockey parents (their eldest son plays professionally in Europe, and their youngest, Ryan, for the Buffalo Sabres)—have seemingly not made the mental switch from bleacher to court bench. Judi speaks over the proceedings as though the lawyers are talking directly to her. She brushes off her son’s suit before he enters the courtroom and hands him his notebook like it’s his lunch box before he prepares to take his seat.

It’s their demeanours that are boyish too. They were identified as potential cash cows at a young age, their high school education and socialization truncated by out-of-town tournaments and practice schedules. In court, McLeod hunches over his notebook like he’s passing time in detention; during recesses, he can’t stop flipping his water bottle to see if he can catch it. Foote sulks behind his lawyers, walking into the courthouse like he is being dragged by his mother through the mall; Dubé is surprisingly jocular for someone who is on trial; on breaks, I see him laughing with his girlfriend, who shows up most days and sits with the McLeods.

This comes from a Walrus article titled: What was left Unsaid in the Hockey Canada Trial written by Ariella Garmaise

https://thewalrus.ca/what-was-left-unsaid-in-the-hockey-canada-trial/

The Defendants is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Full Team:

Jane Aster Roe - Executive Producer, Host

Anuja Jaiswal - Host

Rachel Arundel - Executive Producer

Katie Jensen - Executive Producer, Editor, Sound Designer

Dawson Fleming - Production Assistant

Cheryl Grossman - Legal

Dalton Higgons - Publicity

Discussion about this episode

User's avatar

Ready for more?